Securie vs Aikido
Aikido aggregates OSS scanners into one platform. Securie ships purpose-built specialists with closed-loop chain.
Different architectures.
Aikido for OSS-aggregator platform value. Securie for specialist depth + closed-loop.
Feature comparison
| Securie | Aikido | |
|---|---|---|
| OSS scanner aggregation | Specific specialists, not aggregation | Yes — their core |
| Sandbox-verified prove-don't-flag | Yes | No |
| Specialist depth | 26 detectors + RedTeam | OSS-aggregator depth |
| Attestation chain | DSSE + Sigstore | Limited |
Where the difference shows up in practice
Lovable-BOLA-class bug
Aikido: Aggregated OSS scanners don't have Lovable-specific specialist.
Securie: Supabase RLS + AuthAuthz specialist catches.
The deeper tradeoff
Aikido's value is orchestration of OSS scanners (Trivy, Semgrep, Gitleaks). Securie ships purpose-built specialists targeting AI-built-app bug classes. Different bets.
Pricing
$499-$13,500/mo paid ladder
Per-team
Migration playbook
Step 1: Compare coverage
What: Run both 2 weeks.
Why: Architectural difference.
Gotchas: Track FP rate.
When to pick Aikido
Aggregator value across many OSS tools.
When to pick Securie
Specialist depth + closed-loop.
Bottom line
Aikido for teams wanting orchestrated OSS scanners; Securie for specialist depth on AI-built apps.
FAQ
Aikido aggregates Securie?
No — Securie is specialist + closed-loop, not an OSS scanner.